EDUCATION IS A BATTLEGROUND. GOOD TEACHERS ARE WARRIORS. THESE ARE THE FRONTLINES.
Home   Columns   Commentaries   Graduate Students
Curriculum Vitae
  Speeches   Publications  
China
 

KS School Naturalist

Contact
 

 

Release: March 15, 2010
Wordcount: 602

Return of the Scarlet Letter

In the midst of the March State Board of Education meeting, one Board member related how a grandchild—who was doing fine in school academics—was sick and vomiting over the worry and stress of the state assessments.

March is assessment time, and schools across Kansas are pouring on pressure to get students to work as hard as possible. Any school that repeatedly fails to make adequate yearly progress toward the 2014 goal of everyone being proficient suffers penalties.

Therefore schools do all they can to get students to make every effort on the assessment tests.
Certainly nothing can be wrong with that. Or is there?

I e-mailed this example in a summary of the Board’s actions that I send to teachers across the state. Boy did I get an earful back.

The Board member had noted that cheerleaders are used to get students pumped for the tests. It goes much farther. Score above proficiency or above average and you may get a pizza party or a bowling party or a free afternoon in the gym. Students who score low get to cool their heels back in a classroom. Then there are the posters in the hall with student names or pictures, labeled by who scored above average or exemplary. Getting your yearbook picture can depend on your score. Or it might be stamped with the special “E.”

From the sample I received, there must be many hundreds if not thousands of Kansas students who are physically ill during this assessment season. Students who don’t care about grades and academics will just sit down, mark all one letter, and “blow off” the test. This epidemic of stress is mostly among students who will pass the state assessments. They sense the tremendous tension the school is under. They are empathetic. And they recognize the stigma this places on classmates who do not test as well.

If a student is three grades behind in reading, and a hard-working reading teacher has brought the student forward two grade levels in one year, that student will still be below grade level and fail the test. For all of this work, the student will not get the pizza or bowling party, and will sit in the room with the other “dummies.” No one says that word. They just think it. You have to know kids at this age to know how much this hurts.

The students know. There is at least one reported case of a student who just passed the assessment asking to not go to the reward party but to sit with classmates who didn’t. That is heroism similar in nature to the Hollanders who all wore yellow patches in unity with the Jews who would be persecuted. No, we are not killing children. But for some, we are just killing their spirit.

I am the last person to defend the “self esteem” movement. But this is not about self-esteem. It is about administrators and teachers thinking they are justified to use shame as a means to an end. They feel forced to take these wrong actions by the despotic No Child Left Behind high stakes accountability system—a blame game. Students are the victims of schools trying to cover their...assessments.

We are not branding students’ foreheads with the letter “F” for life. Just ostracizing them. Labeling their names. Omitting their pictures.

When so many good youngsters get physically sick during these assessment weeks, we fairly well know that it will leave scars inside.

The lesson students learn is that adults—who should know better—can be coerced into hurting them.

-30-

John Richard Schrock




 
  Home | Columns | Commentaries | Contact  
  © 2009-2011 John Richard Schrock